Meta-analysis of ‘what works’

A meta-analysis is an analysis of a large number of studies and is used to try to draw out a general pattern from a very large number of results. Meta-analyses of educational research have become more popular in recent years, as a way of identifying methods and strategies that might have high probability of success in raising student attainment. However, a meta-analysis can only be as valid and reliable as the studies that it draws upon – so the recommendations that arise from these studies come with significant caveats.

To compare different teaching strategies, a meta-analysis will use ‘effect sizes’. An effect size of 1.0 indicates that a strategy has advanced the learning of students in the study by one standard deviation above the mean. An effect size of 1.0 is often presented as equivalent to about 2 GCSE grades – so a very large positive effect.

Here is an example from John Hattie, who conducted a meta-analysis of over 52,000 studies:

Professor John Hattie’s meta-analysis

A more detailed look at these strategies and the effect sizes associated with them can be found from John Hattie’s own website.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Research Lead and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Meta-analysis of ‘what works’

  1. Pingback: The effects and impact of AfL | Evidence into practice @ Turnford

  2. Pingback: Improving the effectiveness of homework | Evidence into practice @ Turnford

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s